Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+sunspot\s+cycle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+sunspot\s+cycle\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Sunspot Cycle (score: 1): Author: kl7y@Alaska.NET (Dan Robbins); Date: Sat Nov 8 10:15:15 1997; "Patrick McIntosh of Heliosynoptics, Inc., and Pierre Cugnon of the Sunspot Index Data Center find the September increase (of sunspots) 'very significant'. Furthermore, McIntosh notes that in Septem; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00193.html (6,972 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Sunspot Cycle (score: 1): Author: hwardsil@WOLFENET.com (Ward Silver); Date: Sat Nov 8 16:24:00 1997; Not only that article, but there's a fine article on using meteor scatter from the upcoming Leonid shower on the 17th to do some FM station DXing. Same issue, p. 108. 73, Ward N0AX -- CQ-Contest on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00226.html (6,805 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: Bill kollenbaum via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 19:24:12 +0000 (UTC); The post was not about the demise of contesting, it was about sunspots numbers and propagation. If you look at the numbers, they predict a flux consistently in the 50s. I can't remember ever seeing; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00183.html (7,756 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 13:54:07 -0600; You're right about the flux numbers. I have been keeping track of these things for 4 minimums. 65 is the lowest I remember. 73, Steve, N2IC On 03/24/2019 01:24 PM, Bill kollenbaum via CQ-Contest wrot; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00185.html (9,151 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 17:36:26 -0400; If you're into FT8 there seems to be plenty of DX spotted on a daily basis to keep your typical DXer happy despite the bad radio conditions. Can you see the scenario in the future that those casual c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00186.html (9,021 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: robert <wa1fcn@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 20:53:35 -0500; GE Jeff I hate to say it but your remark about "dumb down contest to the point where no skills are required " is on the horizon when it comes to FT8. This from someone who s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00187.html (10,502 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 22:41:53 -0500; Thanks Frank for a little sanity in this discussion. The sky has not fallen and here is plenty of DX to work. I am on 40 meters virtually every night and the propagation into EU is just fine, not to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00188.html (11,422 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 08:05:41 -0500; Thing is about FT-8,, As someone who has played with it a LOT. 1000's of contacts. And have tried in a few contests too. And I can see only two ways it will ever be a "Contest Mode" 1- When the condi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00189.html (12,914 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: robert <wa1fcn@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:41:35 -0500; GM Joe Well I do agree with you about contest and FT8. I will certainly admit it has it's pluses and minuses. In my case I really believe it is a passing thing. I just can not; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00190.html (13,745 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:18:22 +0000; One tiny issue bugs me a bit, that being the fact that as slow as FT8 may be, it takes longer to fill out the QSL card that is demanded INSTANTLY after the Q is logged, than it does to log the Q. So.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00191.html (8,986 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:26:25 -0400; Regarding Dale's comments ... FT8 and contesting... CW can win against SO1R FT8..... How would traditional modes stack-up against someone running SO5R FT8 in a contest situation? Dave WN4AFP -- Dave; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00193.html (10,016 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:52:27 -0700; It can't get much dumber than CQWW, where the exchange for most countries is can have only one value and auto-filled by the logging program -- all the op has to do is get the call right. 73, Jim K9YC; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00194.html (8,953 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:29:05 -0600; Unless you are operating outside the USA and working USA stations. Then you need to actually copy the zone - 3, 4 or 5. 73, Steve, N2IC It can't get much dumber than CQWW, where the exchange for most; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00195.html (9,360 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle (score: 1): Author: <pa5mw@home.nl>; Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 23:38:47 +0100; During this C24 minimum I see daily WW dx spots on my NCDXF/IARU HF Beacon monitor 24/7 On a 2x25ft wire dipole @15ft above ground See pa5mw.com Wkd 772 Q's in the RDX contest , using a 2el trapped t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00197.html (11,473 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]