Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+re\s+Is\s+it\s+time\s+to\s+reevaluate\s+CQWW\s+Scoring\s+Rules\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+re\s+Is\s+it\s+time\s+to\s+reevaluate\s+CQWW\s+Scoring\s+Rules\?\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] re Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Clarke" <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:10:37 -0500; This subject seems to resurface every year around this time. I don't believe you can make the scoring fair for everyone because every location has its own advantages and disadvantages. While those in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00276.html (8,306 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]