Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+re\:\s+NAQP\s+and\s+the\s+\(midwest\)\(south\)east\s+coast\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] re: NAQP and the (midwest)(south)east coast (score: 1)
Author: "Scott R." <w4pa@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 11:16:37 -0800 (PST)
Jeff: The overall point I was trying to make is that I don't feel any particular QTH has an advantage in NAQP on any given weekend. Some may have a slight disadvantage, like W1 or W8, but no particul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00440.html (10,883 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] re: NAQP and the (midwest)(south)east coast (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Baugh" <tombaugh@discoverynet.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:17:17 -0600
Don't kid yourselves Guys..... There are distinct advantages in location in every contest. There are few contests which "balance the playing field" (Stew Perry comes to mind) Likewise there are few c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00442.html (10,307 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] re: NAQP and the (midwest)(south)east coast (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:17:25 EST
No matter how you slice it, the West coast does have an overall advantage in NAQP. You will never find an NAQP without a pretty good number of west coast stations represented in the top ten, even if
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00443.html (8,626 bytes)

4. RE: [CQ-Contest] re: NAQP and the (midwest)(south)east coast (score: 1)
Author: "Felipe J. Hernandez" <felipe@isla.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 19:49:33 -0400
Bill, Isnt it funny how life finds its way of balancing things? Felipe --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Cqtestk4xs@a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00445.html (9,986 bytes)

5. RE: [CQ-Contest] re: NAQP and the (midwest)(south)east coast (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <aa7bg@3rivers.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:34:33 -0700
Any TRUE competitor shall pack up his gear and head for Kansas wherein he will operate every contest. Anybody operating outside of Kansas is only kidding themselves and shall be deemed operating outs
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00456.html (11,169 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] re: NAQP and the (midwest)(south)east coast (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck Kraly" <k0xm@kc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:41:48 -0600
Ok, now just a minute.....If you DIDN'T work KS in the latest NAQP's it wasn't because we didn't try.....hihi. I try and get active in both cw es ssb, so maybe in August. BTW it's fine. Don't try and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00459.html (13,456 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] re: NAQP and the (midwest)(south)east coast (score: 1)
Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:43:59 EST
I think we can conclude the discussion of geographic advantage by looking at the CQ 160 CW high claimed scores. Life ain't fair. Get over it or buy houses in the Caribbean, EA9, Maine, New Mexico and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00469.html (8,211 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu