Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+intentional\s+QRMing\s+rare\s+ones\s+\-\s+SS\s+SSB\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] intentional QRMing rare ones - SS SSB (score: 1)
Author: asciibaron@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:48:47 +0000
while attempting to work VY1MB on 20m on Sunday in SS SSB, i had to work around another station who was 400 hertz down on 14.155. there was a rather large pileup on VY1MB, and the other station was w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00604.html (9,809 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] intentional QRMing rare ones - SS SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <mike@mallardcove.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:44:53 -0700
I heard that same guy. I finally managed to work VY1MB around him. I never heard him doing the same with NH6P. NH6P was much louder. It seemed odd to me too. I had my own personal qrm issue. I was on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00609.html (11,811 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] intentional QRMing rare ones - SS SSB (score: 1)
Author: Mike Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:33:30 -0500
Steve, you did the *exact* right thing, and I for one commend you. As for a complaint against the offender, you might check with Mr Hollingsworth if you could drop off the other guys callsign without
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00630.html (8,066 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] intentional QRMing rare ones - SS SSB (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:06:05 -0600
Steve, I can appreciate your frustration, but I suggest there may be some other points of view. You didn't say who was there first - I assume you probably tuned upon the scenario already in progress
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00637.html (9,033 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] intentional QRMing rare ones - SS SSB (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:07:01 -0500
I agree with Mark. If the other station was there first, then the newly-arrived rare mult doesn't necessarily get priority use of the frequency. This happened to me numerous times in CQWW Phone. I wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00647.html (8,840 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] intentional QRMing rare ones - SS SSB (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 06:08:40 -0800 (PST)
As a low power contestor this happens to me all the time... I am happily chirping away on a frequency, beaming off to europe or where ever, and suddenly all hell breaks loose either right on me, or a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00681.html (7,872 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] intentional QRMing rare ones - SS SSB (score: 1)
Author: asciibaron@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:16:13 +0000
i have no way of knowing who was there first in the first instance, looking at the packet history of when i came across them, it's hard to say - they were both spotted within 2 minutes of each other
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00682.html (8,931 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu