Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+dupes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+dupes\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:42:41 -0500; Hmmm. Albert, I agree with you... to a point. Here's the problem with not working dupes. In a given contest, I don't have you in my log on 20 meters, but you think that you do (let's say for the sake; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00053.html (11,939 bytes)
22. [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:15:35 -0800; Why do stations still give the 'qso b4' message when someone calls? I called a certain ZL and was rewarded with a 'qso b4' reply. That station, or none with anything like their callsign, was in my lo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00235.html (6,896 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:20:17 -0600; It is frustrating to call a station only to have him abruptly send "QSO B4" and then call CQ again without giving you a chance to respond. Now your choices are to just move on or try again and have a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00239.html (7,956 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:32:42 -0700; There are a number of contests that don't have a high participation percentage of Wy hams... and it is real easy for me to accept the "QB4" and look for another multiplier of that same flavor... chan; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00241.html (7,841 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:43:39 -0800; Yes. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00243.html (7,659 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:47:40 -0600; I had an interesting exchange on 10m CW this past weekend. I was in S&P mode and came across a station, typed in his call, and sent my call. He came back with his next serial number but appended "B4"; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00251.html (8,859 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:42:02 -0800; The difference here is that you noticed you mistyped the call and had it wrong. My instance was in the 10 meter contest this weekend when a ZL station gave me QSO B4 and there was nothing in my log e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00271.html (8,769 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 00:41:03 -0600; I am an adamant supporter of never using QSO B4, just rework the station and move on... up until last weekend... now there's a slight crack in my adamancy! I liked that our stride was not broken but; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00306.html (9,999 bytes)
29. [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: "Doug Turnbull" <turnbull@net1.ie>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 06:24:46 -0500; Subject Dupes I am afraid that later on in a contest after being spotted that sometimes I get a slew of people who have worked me previously from the Western USA calling again. I do not want dupes in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00311.html (8,150 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:08:12 -0500; Here is the problem with sending QSO B4. Lets assume I have your call wrong in my log - that would be the only reason to call you a second time. I then get a QSO B4, but I have NO idea when I worked; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00319.html (10,593 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:38:55 -0600; most ops work the dupes because if I callled you, you must not be in my log I tried to work a few stations this 10 meter contest and they said qso b4 so I qsy'd and they are NOT in my log logging sof; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00352.html (12,391 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:30:21 -0600; /"logging software removes the dupes" // / Good logging software (and operators) do not remove the dupes. Log checking software "deals with" the dupes. It does''t remove the dupes either. 73 de Bob -; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00359.html (13,352 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Steve Lott <lottsphoto@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 10:16:03 -0600; Oh iow you say "To Mat o" and I say "too mat o" yes I get it End result is work the dupes, right :) cheers! steve KG5VK http://www.KG5VK.com My Ham Radio Friends _____________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00414.html (15,210 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 33
Page: [1] [2]