Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cut\s+numbers\s+\-\s+a\s+support\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cut\s+numbers\s+\-\s+a\s+support\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] cut numbers - a support (score: 1): Author: CP2235@aol.com (CP2235@aol.com); Date: Thu May 29 06:34:08 1997; oh well... I think that is a bit too hard. I want to expand my short comment about cut numbers a bit because I am surprised so many people are against them. 1,. I agree with the point that one shoul; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00299.html (10,961 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] cut numbers - a support (score: 1): Author: WI0R@aol.com (WI0R@aol.com); Date: Fri May 30 11:16:26 1997; Cut numbers are the wave of the future. You might as well get used to them. Besides, they provide a bit of interest to an otherwise dull exchange. Clearly they are not appropriate in an alpha-numeric; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-05/msg00328.html (7,037 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]