Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cqww\s+dxcluster\s+use\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cqww\s+dxcluster\s+use\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] cqww dxcluster use (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 10:40:49 +0100; This list is interesting. Anyone got any reactions to it? 73 Jim SM2EKM -- Non-USA SOAB HP A61AJ(S53R) 7304 175 624 48 16,234,881 OE4A(OE1EMS) 5206 169 644 45 9,749,496 FS/AH8DX 5544 134 484 46 8,433; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00098.html (8,077 bytes)
2. RE: [CQ-Contest] cqww dxcluster use (score: 1): Author: "Andy Blank" <n2nt@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:11:10 -0000; I do. Put a great operator like Robert at a great station like A61AJ and you get a great score. Fabulous job. That's all. 73, Andy N2NT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00101.html (8,709 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww dxcluster use (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 09:37:45 -0500; to it? Add a column which shows total multipliers (Z+C) divided by total QSO's and see if anything looks odd. Same issue I had a few years ago...which CQ addressed in their SSB results story in Aug 2; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00102.html (8,372 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww dxcluster use (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:44:04 -00; I'm not sure what significance that math has (essentially it gives you the inverse of "QSO's per Mult"), but I did the math and here are the numbers: A61AJ 0.11 OE4A 0.16 FS/AH8DX 0.11 VO1AU 0.11 VO; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00114.html (8,784 bytes)
5. RE: [CQ-Contest] cqww dxcluster use (score: 1): Author: "Bernie McClenny" <bernie@dailydx.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 23:12:56 -0000; I do. There are other scores between # 1 and # 3 that have not been reported! Bernie Bernie McClenny, W3UR Now more than ever - you need The Daily DX and The Weekly DX - to keep up with the DX news f; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00115.html (9,838 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww dxcluster use (score: 1): Author: "John WA2GO" <xnewyorka@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 23:18:56 -0500; I have no idea what we are getting at here, but statistically speaking, if you graph the (z+c)/q value and draw a best fit curve, the only ones that are noteworthy are #2 & #7 which are slightly abov; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00121.html (9,655 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww dxcluster use (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 12:36:09 -0500; you said it could be due to spending more time S&P-ing versus running. I agree it is probably not enough out-of-line to justify follow up. CQ has other ways to detect potential problems. In this cas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00129.html (10,389 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]