Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cqcontest\.net\s*$/: 93 ]

Total 93 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Fco. Luis Delgadillo" <xe2b@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:30:43 -0600
Fellow contesters, As an IT profesional, I understand the tremendous effort it takes to design, debug, install and maintain an interactive portal such as cqcontest.net (and similar ones) I'm thankful
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00149.html (12,479 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Braco OE1EMS" <oe1ems@emssolutions.at>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 08:42:56 +0200
Hello to everyone, i would like to hear opinion of community Does use (wathching or watching and posting) of www.cqcontest .net web site made single operator as assisted or not? Since I have be warne
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00024.html (7,129 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 11:40:59 +0000 (UTC)
Contests have rules so that subjectivity is removed as much as possible. Even N4TZ being the contest director, his personal likes and likes are irrelevant. The WPX contest rule is very clear in its o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00025.html (11,061 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Ricardo Navarrete <ricardoea4zk@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 14:37:09 +0200
Hi braco and all.... If we interpret the bases strictly you are right, posting your score on cqcontest web site could be interpreted as assisted , but how many contesters watch Web based clusters and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00026.html (9,239 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:12:07 -0500
Hi Bruce, Assisted is very clearly defined in the rules of most major contests: it is the receiving specifically of other stations' callsigns and frequencies. It is not a matter of opinion. Read the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00027.html (9,426 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 09:34:36 -0300
Hey Braco, Thanks for all the Q's over the years. Although the rules may not specifically say it, I think anything outside your logging program that has anything whatsoever to do with frequencies (or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00028.html (8,667 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hurlbut <chriskl9a@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 10:16:00 -0600
Watching a live score board to see band changes of competitors is exactly why I was opposed to this idea at WRTC. How many guys would have changed their strategy based on what others were doing? My g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00029.html (9,277 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Filipe Lopes <ct1ilt@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 19:51:25 +0200
My opinion posted on Facebook in Braco's post, was clearly about knowing which bands one who is posting on CQCONTEST.NET is, this for me is clearly ASSISTED. Here is the link to the discussin itself
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00030.html (11,414 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 11:09:46 -0700
Agreed. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00031.html (8,468 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 12:41:16 -0600
I have been watching this thread unfold on Facebook since last Monday. At first, I was unsympathetic to Braco's arguments, that he was not breaking the current rules. But, reading the rules, he was c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00032.html (10,156 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 10:59:41 -0800
Which Facebook group is this? 73 Steve KL7SB I have been watching this thread unfold on Facebook since last Monday. At first, I was unsympathetic to Braco's arguments, that he was not breaking the cu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00033.html (11,782 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 20:00:01 +0100
<snip> Single line score probably doesn't do much, and isn't much assistance. (Total Q's, total mults, and total score.) Full band break down seems like assistance to me. "Assisted" is a meaningless
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00034.html (10,193 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 21:00:26 +0200
You are saying the use of Flexradio 6xxx Transceivers or ANAN is "assisted". 73 Peter I've said this before but assistance should almost be renamed to "connected", hi..or just say in the rules "only
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00035.html (8,394 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 14:04:54 -0500
Assisted is not defined as below in the rules of most contests. It is defined as receiving, through any means other than finding the station yourself while tuning, SPECIFIC information about callsign
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00036.html (12,811 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 16:09:58 -0400
Steve, Do consider your response in the context of the previous widely popular thread on attracting youth to contesting. The realtime scoreboard makes contesting a contest for many ops that do not st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00037.html (10,204 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 14:36:47 -0600
Rudy, I think you have misinterpreted my response. We are talking about the unassisted category. While it is up the the contest directors and managers to make a ruling, I would imagine that for the a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00038.html (10,620 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 16:52:58 -0400
Steve, Unfortunately we are talking about the same- the non-assisted category that attempts to freeze time and technological progress and perpetuate "the man and his radio" philosophy. The category l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00039.html (11,586 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 19:57:21 -0400
Sorry I'm late to reply, this is the first chance I've had to read my email all day... By using the website to determine which bands are open to you at any given time, and considering that this is ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00040.html (9,808 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: K3RAG LB3RE Brobakken <post@lb3re.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 04:08:43 +0300
Hello. During SAC we had nordic battle many years. We used scoreboard as a challenge to see the race between all of us. Even contest committee member agreed Even Top contester OH6KZP kim developed th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00041.html (10,500 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "Fco. Luis Delgadillo" <xe2b@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 03:37:21 +0000
I totally support Rag's position . It is innovative, and the scoreboards add another layer of emotion. 73 Luis XE2B Enviado desde mi Huawei de Telcel -- Mensaje original -- Asunto: [CQ-Contest] cqcon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00042.html (10,506 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu