Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+consider\s+this\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+consider\s+this\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: k0hb@earthlink.net (KØHB); Date: Wed Apr 24 20:32:58 2002; Of course it's an advantage, just like being able to copy QRQ code is an advantage. In other words, it's a skill and skilled people have an advantage. I'm not an SO2R guy, in fact I have trouble bein; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00347.html (8,978 bytes)
22. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Larry Tree Tyree N6TR); Date: Wed Apr 24 13:37:01 2002; I would like to point out that the CW Sprint lists the number of band changes for the top ten stations. This easily shows who is using two radios and how much they are using it. Typically, one or tw; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00348.html (8,944 bytes)
23. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: ford@cmgate.com (Ford Peterson); Date: Wed Apr 24 16:09:15 2002; SO2R is to contesting what running two fishing lines is to a fishing contest. Two radios does not double the Qs. It may however double your score. Chasing down mults while running a frequency is not; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00351.html (9,900 bytes)
24. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com (Jimk8mr@aol.com); Date: Wed Apr 24 17:21:49 2002; SO2R stands out in my mind not because it lets a person run up a bigger score than would, say, a huge antenna farm, but because it leads to different operating techniques that while great for the use; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00352.html (10,226 bytes)
25. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ); Date: Wed Apr 24 16:34:03 2002; It IS an advantage - but only to those who can do it well! There is no need for any further analysis. Heck, I run SO2R from home with my TH3jr at 15' and my vertical. It's cool, but I'm not going to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00355.html (15,644 bytes)
26. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones, KR6X); Date: Wed Apr 24 16:06:18 2002; Mike -- Beyond the issue of whether SO2R deserves a category by itself there's a new one that is seldom mentioned. If a contest sponsor were to create an SO2R category, then would there be any way to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00357.html (11,436 bytes)
27. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: Wed Apr 24 19:29:09 2002; At the risk of not knowing the answer to a question before I ask it, I wonder how true this is? It would be good to compare the logs of top SO1R and SO2R stations and compare the "park time" on a giv; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00359.html (10,426 bytes)
28. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: ve4xt@mts.net (Kelly Taylor); Date: Wed Apr 24 21:46:52 2002; Comparing SO2R and assisted is not a fair analogy. Packet requires no skill, involves the assistance of others and makes mult hunting the equivalent of shooting fish in a barrel. SO2R requires consid; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00360.html (10,351 bytes)
29. Fw: [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: k7qq@netzero.net (Rex Maner); Date: Thu Apr 25 05:27:44 2002; QUACK's Gosh I'm sure we had this same discussion Last year and The year before etc: How many times we gonna have to read this STUFF Nuff Said Already Rex location, learn; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00365.html (10,172 bytes)
30. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: k8do@amethyst.diamondcs.net (Dennis O'Connor); Date: Thu Apr 25 09:34:10 2002; Leigh, like you I am always interested in new ideas... But this one I love... You run an SO8R and I will follow you around... I can probably make a good living off the guys answering your run radio t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00370.html (10,108 bytes)
31. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: Thu Apr 25 07:11:28 2002; While a valid point, this would not be unique to an SO2R category. Almost ALL categories (hell, even your state/section) are essentially unenforceable. While there is surely a high correlation betwee; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00373.html (9,830 bytes)
32. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu Apr 25 11:53:08 2002; Horsepucky. You don't NEED a NEW transceiver for SO2R. A second-hand radio will do just fine. You don't NEED an amplifier for SO2R. If you don't like going barefoot, even a modest amplifier will prov; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00375.html (8,640 bytes)
33. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu Apr 25 11:21:11 2002; While the contest sponsors don't report it in every case, you'll find that the forms for the 3830 list DO have a field for SO2R operation. It wouldn't be hard to correlate the listings on 3830 with t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00376.html (8,534 bytes)
34. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu Apr 25 12:06:48 2002; Not exactly. SO2R doesn't mean you can transmit on both similtaneously. You are still constrained to have one transmitted signal on the air at one time. It's more like having two fishing lines where; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00377.html (10,312 bytes)
35. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu Apr 25 11:28:04 2002; Not exactly, Lee. Certainly the operator must perceive it to be an advantage, or they wouldn't do it. I think it takes considerable skill for it to be a true advantage. And some SO2R operators don't; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00378.html (8,847 bytes)
36. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu Apr 25 11:46:59 2002; Seems like this is a mis-conception as well. Why do the two stations have to be equal? Consider - to get benefit from SO2R, do you really need a top-of-the-line transceiver? Do you really need a seco; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00379.html (10,430 bytes)
37. Fw: [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: k7qq@netzero.net (Rex Maner); Date: Thu Apr 25 18:02:37 2002; Quacks OK but Gold nugget????? improvement is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00384.html (10,651 bytes)
38. [CQ-Contest] consider this (score: 1): Author: k6ll@despammed.com (k6ll@despammed.com); Date: Thu Apr 25 12:25:44 2002; I would like to point out that the CW Sprint lists the number of band changes for the top ten stations. This easily shows who is using two radios and how much they are using it. Typically, one or two; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00385.html (8,561 bytes)
39. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: n5ia@zia-connection.com (Milt Jensen); Date: Thu Apr 25 10:19:39 2002; SNIP who like-minded can This seems logical to me. This approach would be similar to what is now done for the Field Day contest (err, Operating Event) where the QRP entries are allowed to enter diffe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00386.html (10,250 bytes)
40. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@arrl.net (David Robbins); Date: Thu Apr 25 21:17:13 2002; equivalent of Of course it takes skill, otherwise the assisted ops and all the multi ops would have many more multipliers than unassisted. It takes lots of skill to know when to go after spots and w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00400.html (9,313 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]