Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+at\s+long\s+last\:\s+contest\s+EQUITY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+at\s+long\s+last\:\s+contest\s+EQUITY\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] at long last: contest EQUITY (score: 1): Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (Doug KR2Q); Date: Sun Apr 5 09:38:49 1998; Contesters: Reading over all the musings about the WPX (or whatever the "contest of the month" happens to be), I can see that the goal in all cases seems to be to be able to compare apples to apples; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00082.html (7,803 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] at long last: contest EQUITY (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC); Date: Sun Apr 5 11:53:25 1998; << How about a score (no, not officially sanctioned, just for a fun comparison) that is the result of station/operater PRODUCTIVITY. Each entrant can operate as many hours as they want to. Take your; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00086.html (7,268 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] at long last: contest EQUITY (score: 1): Author: W2CE@prodigy.net (W2CE); Date: Sun Apr 5 18:07:27 1998; I sure wouldn't mind seeing a "short hours" type of recognition. There are some people who have contested for years that may not be physically able any more. With a severe heart problem, pending mor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00096.html (8,086 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]