- 1. [CQ-Contest] a rose by any other name......renaming SOA? (score: 1)
- Author: kr2q@optonline.net
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:33:44 +0000 (GMT)
- Hi all: Okay, I'm telling you now...this posting is OUT OF CHARACTER for me. Here is a JUST FOR FUN posting (well, mostly "just for fun"). Single-Op, Assisted Single-Op, Unlimited Single-Op, Enhanced
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00539.html (7,452 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] a rose by any other name......renaming SOA? (score: 1)
- Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:26:20 -0000
- But we don't knew by who or how much??? We must be more specific! But you are limited to a single op?? sounds like an oxymoron to me... or is that what the operator is? Does this only apply to 'natu
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00547.html (9,345 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] a rose by any other name......renaming SOA? (score: 1)
- Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:43:57 -0000
- Single-Op Caught-in-the-Act-with-no-companion Beep beep, de Hans, K0H-- Single-Op Elderly _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lis
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00552.html (7,543 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu