Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Zero\s+Pointers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Zero\s+Pointers\s*$/: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:19:16 -0500; Hi Steve...you are possibly reading too much into this interchange...first and foremost you will get credit for your qso...I merely used that tactic to draw attention to what I feel is a great discre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00663.html (10,064 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Pointers (score: 1): Author: sawyered@earthlink.net; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:44:14 -0500 (GMT-05:00); Guys. I can totally appreciate the frustration of SIGNIFICANT zero point Qs for many running stations in the US that are outsdie the Northeast. However, why is the dialog towards radically changing t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00667.html (9,456 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "Gerard Lynch" <gerrylynch@freenetname.co.uk>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:52:03 -0000; In CQWW SSB, I love nothing more than sitting on all that empty space between 7.040 and 7.065 and working DLs for two points a go. It's great. 73 Gerry G0RTN Vanity Page at http://www.gerrylynch.co.u; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00668.html (9,884 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: k3bu@optonline.net; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:56:18 +0000 (GMT); Nothing new, we been moaning about it for years!!! Or picture (me) poor slob on 160 in the middle of the W/K/N ocean of stations that would like to work in the contest, only to find out that band suc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00669.html (11,181 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:43:31 -0600; Rick, NQ4I wrote: ....do you think its fair for my station to respond to the I think it goes with the territory of being one of the world's premiere contest stations. He who casts the widest net catc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00672.html (8,687 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:29:47 -0700; And this will be happening more and more... Count on it... so grab two Qs from those hard to get places. --... ...--Dale - WC7S in Wy> > For example, what if 5 of those zero pointers were ID, ND, SD,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00678.html (8,948 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:09:06 -0000; If not 1 point per domestic, why not 1 point for every 5 or 10 domestics so, while it's not as beneficial to work your own country, you at least get something at the end of the day? -- Paul VO1HE __; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00679.html (10,113 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: Charles Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:47:08 -0500; Yeah - he was also my first QSO of the contest - I think I had maybe 2 hours all contest to operate - and I appreciate the multiplier I got (I hope) - Made ONE USA call, and Rick happened to be it. M; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00681.html (9,521 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:45:04 -0000; A unique opportunity will present itself shortly for those who argue about changing rules for points and such. Just wait until the logs themselves are published and then take the top 10 or so in each; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00687.html (8,575 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:56:58 -0500; I agree that the multi-multi or even the loud single bander such as K4XS on 40 SSB has been that you get a lot of zero point QSOs. To just ignore the callers is wrong as is to not really log them. On; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00688.html (10,652 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "B. Scott Andersen" <bsandersen@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:27:20 -0500; Rick, I read with interest your screed on zero points. I worked the contest QRP and worked you as an "easy 05" to ensure I got the multiplier. When doing such things (causing a zero-pointer), I wait; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00689.html (11,353 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:16:00 -0000; WOOOOAAAAHHHHHHH I'm hearing all this complaining about ZERO point Q's and why don't the contest commity make own country Q's NO GOOD, Isn't this what the ZERO point does ??? Now the next time you wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00691.html (10,357 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:45:42 EST; Most little pistols might work the same, loud, super-station on all 6 bands for zone/country totals...Why not? I agree with Kelly, he with the largest net, catches the most fishes... ________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00692.html (7,955 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:00:13 -0700; and the dead horse gets beaten one more time................. now my turn again. if i am operating one of those oft neglected categories in the CQWW and want to keep the auto log checkers off my cas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00693.html (8,773 bytes)
35. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 05:26:23 +0100; You can NOT be in PA0 and get 2 points for a DL1. For the 100th time, it is ONLY in NA you get 2 points for working your own continent, rest of the world get 1 point for working their own continent.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00694.html (9,433 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:21:03 -0800 (PST); Now this does present an interesting idea. Every year they have fantasy football leagues based on the players you draft and their season stats. Maybe we could start a fantasy WRTC league, where you "; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00703.html (10,279 bytes)
37. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:52:31 -0500; We call you because we love you... Great job Rick. Your new 80 meter beam was cookin! 73, Dallas _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00705.html (9,339 bytes)
38. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: k3bu@optonline.net; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:27:41 +0000 (GMT); Simnple CQ WW solution: Own country QSOs count 1 point. Own continent QSOs count 2 points Other continents and space count 3 points. This would bring the CQ WW into the 21 century, simple scoring sys; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00707.html (9,864 bytes)
39. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:24:06 -0800 (PST); And have the WPX and IARU contests turned into stateside QSO parties? 73s John W5TD ................................................................ http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00710.html (10,543 bytes)
40. [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "Tim Goeppinger" <timgep@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:56:01 +0000; The zero pointers are a strange artifact of the CQWW rules. To the Big Guns I say: 1. Call CQ DX/VE to scare off newbies who think they are doing you a favor with a stateside QSO. I hate to say befor; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00711.html (9,242 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]