Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Wrap\s+up\:\s+signal\s+report\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Wrap up: signal report (score: 1)
Author: Al Lorona <alorona@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:15:07 -0800 (PST)
Thanks for all of your responses.   Relatively few people feel as strongly about this as I do, which kind of surprises me. Also surprising: that more of the top tier contesters had apparently no opin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00377.html (9,106 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wrap up: signal report (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:21:51 -0800
Yes, I'll be okay with that. 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00385.html (7,232 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wrap up: signal report (score: 1)
Author: "W7TMT" <w7tmt@dayshaw.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:32:50 -0800
Big snip... More snip... Go for it. However, please note that you're not exactly breaking new ground here. My personal favorite for "honest" and "real" signal reports in contests was KH6CC now sadly
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00389.html (8,349 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu