Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+World\s+Records\s+and\s+Verticals\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "KEN SILVERMAN" <k2kw@prodigy.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:54:39 -0800
To set the record straight: Team Vertical did own the WORLD RECORD for M/M in 1998. Period. Don't forget, this was from 2 point land! Can I help it if the CQWW guys can't get it right? If you look to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00020.html (8,906 bytes)

2. RE: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:11:45 +0200
... ... If anyone would calculate the M/M category "Maximum result with Minimum effort", the Team Vertical is a clean sweep champ. PJ9* is clearly at the other end. But the today's records will beco
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00025.html (10,316 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:41:22 -0800
Amen to what Kenny writes. Team Vertical, in 1998 CQ WW CW M/M absolutely kicked our can at our T I 1 C M/M, with all our big yagi's and quads. Some of us have yet to recover from that pasting.......
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00029.html (10,556 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "KEN SILVERMAN" <k2kw@prodigy.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:31:39 -0800
I respectfully disagree. Our results were only possible because we did not listen to conventional wisdom. The models fully support that if you want to win contests on a DXpedition, the only choice i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00041.html (11,240 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 02 Jan 2005 16:41:41 -0600
I have no knowledge of how much power CN8WW was running. But... they were able to hear me on 80 and 160 (multiple times on each band). I've never run more than 1kw. They were doing *something* right.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00043.html (9,355 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:02:34 EST
beat a 10m 4square over salt water. Actually, 10m was the only band that TI1C beat 6Y2A on. On all the other bands, we easily beat them, and they were using some very large arrays on all other bands.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00053.html (10,121 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:11:42 -0000
I challenge anyone to set up 2 or three golf club bags full of verticals over rocky soil in central Texas and out perform towers with Yagis at the same location. Yes verticals in a salt water marsh w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00064.html (10,904 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: <k0luz@topsusa.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:29:00 -0500
Agreed Rusty, A few years ago we were at VP5 using a Butternut 40 meter vertical whose base was actually at the waters edge. The antenna was a bomb! Great runs/pileups to JA in the mornings on 40 and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00067.html (13,238 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 22:14:27 EST
over rocky soil in central Texas and out perform towers with Yagis at the same location. Yes verticals in a salt water marsh work wonderfully, but that does not lead to a conclusion that a vertical o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00071.html (10,092 bytes)

10. RE: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:43:30 +0100
Horizontal dipole needs 0,4 wavelength height in order to radiate at low angles while verticals achieve that with 0,25 or even less! Present aluminum technology puts a practical border for Yagi advan
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00076.html (9,473 bytes)

11. RE: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:06:58 -0600
But you ain't heard nothing like the pileup with a vertical 4 inches above sea level, at sea, on top of the snorkel mast, "K4CSY, Maritime Mobile, submerged beneath the Atlantic" from the USS TUSK SS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00080.html (9,112 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:28:19 -0000
Hey Yuri, you know what might be fun? How about a stack of Yagis on some reasonable sized band, such as 15, 20, or 40, used in a contest, alongside an appropriately scaled set of phased verticals in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00082.html (11,793 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:02:13 EST
reasonable sized band, such as 15, 20, or 40, used in a contest, alongside an appropriately scaled set of phased verticals in essentially the same location, operated by multi-ops going at it full bor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00085.html (8,980 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "John WA2GO" <xnewyorka@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:35:23 -0500
I'm confused - is the debate whether verticals or yagis makes you a better operator in the contest, or is the debate whether verticals or yagis give you stronger transmitted and received signal stren
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00086.html (10,910 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:55:03 EST
operators and equipment is going to win. It's a game, and you can stack the odds (no pun intended), but you still can't predict the outcome with certainty!<< As usual with postings, they tend to drif
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00087.html (9,913 bytes)

16. Re:[CQ-Contest] World Records and Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Bob I.2.WIJ" <i2wij@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:25:29 -0800 (PST)
from [KEN SILVERMAN] Hi Ken, Nah, you are right, they don't work! Also people talking about apples are right. In any case I will keep my bananas (verticals), instead of apples, on the beach of Crete
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00090.html (8,599 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu