Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Win\-Test\s+VS\s+DXLog\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Win\-Test\s+VS\s+DXLog\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Win-Test VS DXLog (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:55:45 -0500; The other day I came across a nice image of what loggers were used in the three CQWW contests. I saved them thankfully, because I can not find where I found them. Anyway it had as usual N1MM+ as bein; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-09/msg00087.html (7,872 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Win-Test VS DXLog (score: 1): Author: Kostas SV1DPI <sv1dpi2@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 22:05:54 +0300; wintest supports far less contests than dxlog. It is very steady in comparison with any other software especially when you have a network and this makes it preferable for dxpeditions. Dxlog supports; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-10/msg00006.html (9,266 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]