Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+What\s+ever\s+happened\s+to\s+being\s+proud\s+you\s+were\s+aham\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+What\s+ever\s+happened\s+to\s+being\s+proud\s+you\s+were\s+aham\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] What ever happened to being proud you were aham? (score: 1): Author: n4wyr@hotmail.com (Ron Thomas); Date: Fri Jul 24 21:05:20 1998; It seems you are assuming that the vote was for the new proposal vs the staus quo. what if the alternative was even worse. Maybe the ones who voted "for" are the good guys. Ron N4WYR recent probably; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00203.html (8,173 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] What ever happened to being proud you were aham? (score: 1): Author: bwilkinson@glasgow-ky.com (Bill 'Tate' Wilkinson); Date: Sat Jul 25 16:08:16 1998; Hello Jim and All I really take offense to the insinuation that if you are something less than an Extra we are "not proud to be a Ham". I must say I have been interested and involved in Amateur Radio; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00227.html (14,752 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]