Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WW\s+SSB\s+\-\s+the\s+corruptive\s+influence\s+of\s+packet\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WW\s+SSB\s+\-\s+the\s+corruptive\s+influence\s+of\s+packet\s*$/: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1): Author: Radiosporting Fan <radiosporting@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 06:28:54 -0800 (PST); This seems to be a common misunderstanding among HF contesters (that VHFers don't seem to have). There's a strategy called "HamIM" that uses high-powered, RF-based, simplex APRS (packet) to track Rov; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00226.html (10,026 bytes)
42. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1): Author: "W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 08:32:22 -0700; The point is there is a choice. You can choose to use packet or not. Nobody is forcing anyone to use it. You have the same choice with rigs, antennas, logging programs etc. You choose the technology; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00236.html (13,302 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 42
Page: [1] [2] [3]