Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WW\-Digi\s+Contest\s+\-\-\s+Rule\s+Clarification\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification (score: 1)
Author: Mike Ricketts <mike.nd9g@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:18:34 -0500
"Didn't someone create a FT8 contest reflector? It would be nice to take all these comments over there. Seems like FT8 is monopolizing the contest reflector just like it is on the air. " There is a r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00058.html (19,939 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:21:34 -0500
But it isn't really. The noise floor is raised greatly when the multiple signals are ran. When it is a single station like a DXepedition, all is fine it is not interfering with anyone. But when you a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00059.html (19,041 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 09:46:17 -0700
Well, the WWROF just created what they hope is a 4th CQWW major contest, the WW-Digi contest, and they've been publicizing it heavily here on the reflector with webinar and practice session announcem
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00060.html (21,174 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 16:50:02 +0000
Hmmm Joe is right, when you are trying to listen in on the whole FT8 band.. the noise to signal ratio goes NUTZ. So, if you are REALLY trying to make a contact... and understanding that we NEVER tran
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00061.html (21,947 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 13:11:15 -0700
Yes, it can be done with WSJT-X without using Fox/Hound.  Here is how K0PIR does it: http://www.k0pir.us/two-instances-of-wsjt-x-running-simultaneously-with-two-radios-two-antennas/ He does it on two
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00062.html (11,178 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 16:57:01 -0400
I might not be politically correct, but why not to mention that one of the all of the DXpeditions' goals is to try to maximize the overall QSO count in order to get more donation? That's what hiding
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00063.html (10,867 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 17:14:22 -0500
What you are saying is only one signal at a time and routinely done by SO2R stations on all modes. Chuck W5PR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00064.html (11,636 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 13:20:51 -0400
Jeff Clark, <<Now that I've reached 100 countries I'm starting to get bored with it.>> Hang in there, Jeff. It starts getting challenging at about 120. The you have to start using some DXer skills, s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00066.html (9,694 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 14:41:54 +0800
Wow, that is amazing.  I had no idea the products were so bad.  I wonder what is at the root cause of that. I was not advocating a rule violation - simply questioning the argument that the occupied b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00075.html (20,227 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu