Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+Competitor\s+loggers\s+2014\,\s+2018\,\s+2022\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+Competitor\s+loggers\s+2014\,\s+2018\,\s+2022\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 12:54:57 -0400; Below compiled from 2022 public logs and 2014/2018 WRTC websites. Best viewed in fixed-width font. Logger 2014 2018 2022 -- -- -- -- N1MM+ 15 25 26 DXLog 1 5 20 Win-Test 40 28 7 Writelog 2 1 3 Skooku; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00091.html (6,809 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 18:10:26 -0400; Wow, DXLog coming on fast, seeming to take most of the wind out of Win-test's sails. I'm not surprised - my impression is that there is mostly nobody home at Win-test any more. 73, Pete N4ZR Best vie; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00093.html (8,163 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: Pavel Perchine <pnihsrep@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 19:44:59 -0600; Hi, I never used DXLog and interested to get more information about the log which has became more and more popular lately. Can anybody point to a source where DXLog compared to N1MM+ software? Pavel; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00096.html (8,607 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 22:23:58 -0400; Interesting data, Win-Test really dropped and DXLog quickly climbed into second place. I may have to move on from Writelog one of these days. Is there data on what transceivers were used? John KK9A B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00098.html (7,580 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: Ed Parish <k1ep.list@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:22:56 -0400; Of course, the fact that Dxlog is now free (as is N1MM+) and Wintest costs money has nothing to do with that trend. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00099.html (9,947 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <pete.n4zr@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:10:48 -0400; I suspect that's right, not merely sarcasm. If you assume that the competitors represent the most serious segment of our hobby, then it doesn't seem likely that cost on the order of what Win-Test ge; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00100.html (10,517 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:35:16 +0100; 15 years ago, N1MM was sweeping all before it. 30 years ago, it was CT, TR Log and NA. Here are some stats for loggers in the IOTA Contest, popular in Europe. https://ei5di.com/iotastat.html 73, Paul; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00101.html (8,228 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 10:41:01 -0700; The interesting question is, what features of DXLog are making it popular among these serious contesters? 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00103.html (8,723 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: Lee Hiers <lee.hiers@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 15:05:24 -0400; I was told once by a serious MM host down this way that N1MM *et al* had to be inferior to Win-Test because WT cost $ and the others were free, and by definition the free software couldn't be as good; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00105.html (11,221 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 19:45:06 -0700; From the DXlog website: "Contrary to e.g., N1MM Logger+, DXLog's default setting is to use a single window, a "desktop". There are many benefits with this, for instance the fact that you can rapidly; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00111.html (10,044 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 21:52:32 -0500; N1MM+ vs DXLog, I have been using N1MM+ for longer than I can remember, And for DZC it is still the primary logger for the club. BUT..... DXLog, is very similar. So far it seems to be capable of doin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00112.html (13,136 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 06:32:50 +0000; Hi Paul, That certainly is an interesting history of loggers. Is there more recent data on line? Haven't done IOTA for a few years, last time was at VK7ZE about 10 years ago. We used N1MM back then.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00118.html (9,128 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Competitor loggers 2014, 2018, 2022 (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 14:45:01 -0500; And this desktop can be extended to multiple monitors also. Joe WB9SBD From the DXlog website: "Contrary to e.g., N1MM Logger+, DXLog's default setting is to use a single window, a "desktop". There a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-07/msg00131.html (10,701 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]