Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+\&\s+SCP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRTC\s+\&\s+SCP\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WRTC & SCP (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN); Date: Thu Jun 21 16:18:21 2001; I was pondering this WRTC thing on the red-eye back to Atlanta last night, and I was thinking about the fact that Super Check Partial is banned from WRTC, but not from ANY other contest. This would s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00141.html (6,999 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] WRTC & SCP (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Fri Jun 29 10:11:02 2001; Bill, I think it depends on how you define SCP. a) If SCP merely does a check on stations that are already IN YOUR LOG, then I don't see a problem with it. It is merely a memory aide for stations you; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00290.html (7,543 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] WRTC & SCP (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: Fri Jun 29 07:47:37 2001; I think the "S" (Super) Check Partial, is, by definition, on a master database. The original "Check Partial" uses only your current log. 73 Mike N2MG ________________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-06/msg00292.html (7,236 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]