Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRONG\!\s+$No\s+matter\s+how\s+you\s+do\s+it\,\s+I\s+still\s+lose\!$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WRONG\!\s+$No\s+matter\s+how\s+you\s+do\s+it\,\s+I\s+still\s+lose\!$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WRONG! (No matter how you do it, I still lose!) (score: 1): Author: DougKR2Q@aol.com (Doug KR2Q); Date: Thu Mar 19 10:58:41 1998; << Well, we will have made about 14K QSOs and in that bunch will be K3CR, AA4LR, W0AH, etc, etc. The logs of K3LR and W0AIH will have nice "N's" on them for the reports of the J6DX QSOs, but there wi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00363.html (11,266 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] WRONG! (No matter how you do it, I still lose!) (score: 1): Author: kg2au@stny.lrun.com (Jimmy Weierich); Date: Sat Mar 21 20:07:39 1998; Wouldn't intentionally not logging ANY QSO permitted under the rules, which would result in the loss of points to another station, be a clear violation of the intent of the rules? Regardless of the r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00397.html (7,367 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]