Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+new\s+log\s+handling\s+procedure\s+\-\s+I\s+agree\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+new\s+log\s+handling\s+procedure\s+\-\s+I\s+agree\!\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX new log handling procedure - I agree! (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:46:43 +0000 (GMT); Interesting comments in K5ZD's WPX blog. This sounds reasonable to me. http://www.cqwpx.com/blog/ Here is a small excerpt: We have decided that for any single operator log where all QSOs are made on; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00357.html (7,167 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]