Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+Survey\s+results\s+\-\s+part\s+1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+Survey\s+results\s+\-\s+part\s+1\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX Survey results - part 1 (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 08:14:39 -0800; Everyone who submitted a log for the WPX RTTY, SSB, and CW contests this year was invited to participate in a survey about the contest. 4555 people from around the world representing all levels of ex; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00008.html (7,824 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Survey results - part 1 (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 08:52:42 +0000; From http://www.cqwpx.com/blog/?p=69 "Sentiment is still in favor of keeping the categories separate, but it is getting closer. The WPX RTTY contest only has one single operator category and does not; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00041.html (8,735 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]