Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+SN\.\.\.\s+broken\s+suffixes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+SN\.\.\.\s+broken\s+suffixes\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX SN... broken suffixes (score: 1): Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:07:08 +0200; It sounds effective and elegant but I think it will fail in most cases due to the anticipation of the listener. Those habits and routines are so strong that even routined ops have difficulties i.e. w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00395.html (10,462 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SN... broken suffixes (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 07:01:55 -0700 (PDT); Towards the end of the contest I had several folks miss one part of the exchange and they sent like 11?9 or 110? I filled in the missing number several times and then sent the entire number. It worke; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00408.html (12,465 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]