Having read all the posts on the M/S rule change proposed by K5ZD, two things have become clear. 1) The majority of posters on CQ-Contest are NOT in favor of the rule change. In fact, they are quite
For those that like the current MS class I say leave it in place. That said, I do think that there is a place for a true M1 class. Some years back three of us operated CQ WW DX and had a lot of fun.
favor of the rule change...and they have spoken loudly and clearly. When argumenting about the validity of surveys, reflectors etc. at least keep in mind: this reflector is of course more a forum of
Now, that's interesting. I thought that Randy posted advance notice of the change, and asked for good reasons why it shouldn't be done. I don't recall him putting it to a vote. We also don't know wha
on contest rules, i guess i could pull out the old HW16, set it up in my living room, put a dipole in a tree, and enter the MM class, or the M2 class or the SOAB HP class, or the SOAB HP assisted? i
Bob and Nate's comments say it all from my perspective. If there is no hard data to support a change in M/S leave it alone (or seek to conduct a pole, however unscientific that may be)... BUT, if it'