Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WPX\s+M\/S\s+Proposed\s+rule\s+change\s+Summary\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Proposed rule change Summary (score: 1)
Author: "Robert L. Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:26:11 -0500
Having read all the posts on the M/S rule change proposed by K5ZD, two things have become clear. 1) The majority of posters on CQ-Contest are NOT in favor of the rule change. In fact, they are quite
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00555.html (9,157 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Proposed rule change Summary (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:53:52 -0600
For those that like the current MS class I say leave it in place. That said, I do think that there is a place for a true M1 class. Some years back three of us operated CQ WW DX and had a lot of fun.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00556.html (7,742 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Proposed rule change Summary (score: 1)
Author: "Christian Schneider" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:03:06 +0100
favor of the rule change...and they have spoken loudly and clearly. When argumenting about the validity of surveys, reflectors etc. at least keep in mind: this reflector is of course more a forum of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00559.html (8,738 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Proposed rule change Summary (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:58:13 -0500
Now, that's interesting. I thought that Randy posted advance notice of the change, and asked for good reasons why it shouldn't be done. I don't recall him putting it to a vote. We also don't know wha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00561.html (11,455 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Proposed rule change Summary (score: 1)
Author: w7dra <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:53:39 -0800
on contest rules, i guess i could pull out the old HW16, set it up in my living room, put a dipole in a tree, and enter the MM class, or the M2 class or the SOAB HP class, or the SOAB HP assisted? i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00570.html (8,369 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Proposed rule change Summary (score: 1)
Author: "W7VJ" <w7vj@millerisar.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:08:58 -0800
Bob and Nate's comments say it all from my perspective. If there is no hard data to support a change in M/S leave it alone (or seek to conduct a pole, however unscientific that may be)... BUT, if it'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00571.html (11,906 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu