Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WHAT\'S\s+THE\s+POINT\.\.\.OMG\.\.\.did\s+anybody\s+actually\s+read\s+the\s+post\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WHAT\'S\s+THE\s+POINT\.\.\.OMG\.\.\.did\s+anybody\s+actually\s+read\s+the\s+post\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WHAT'S THE POINT...OMG...did anybody actually read the post? (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:36:23 +0000 (GMT); I am dumbfounded. The POINT (for me) is that the rules need to be CLEAR. Currently, (for me and obviously for many others), they are NOT clear. THE POINT IS...the rules need to be accurate, precise,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00351.html (7,527 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WHAT'S THE POINT...OMG...did anybody actually read the post? (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 06:21:53 -0600; Yes, good point Doug, and yet it is the watching of someone else, somewhere else, sees what they feel is a wrongful act. If we would read the rules, take them for what we each feel them to mean, pres; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00357.html (8,455 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]