Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WARC\s+Antenna\s+on\s+a\s+single\s+tower\s+for\s+the\s+contester\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WARC\s+Antenna\s+on\s+a\s+single\s+tower\s+for\s+the\s+contester\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WARC Antenna on a single tower for the contester? (score: 1): Author: Timothy Coker <n6win73@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:05:21 -0700; I currently have a 55' crank up tower with 15' of mast sticking out above my thrust bearing. I have an 80m inverted-v a few feet below the thrust bearing, a F12 C31XR right above the thrust bearing,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00168.html (9,342 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC Antenna on a single tower for the contester? (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:43:54 -0600; You pose great questions that are very difficult to answer. Have you noticed any degradation in the operation of the other antennas? If not I would not worry about it. It is a comprimise you make to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00170.html (11,911 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC Antenna on a single tower for the contester? (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:16:51 -0600; Hi Tim, I had a similar setup when I lived on the east coast. I talked with the antenna mfrs at Dayton, then modeled it, too and the WARC antenna really messed up the pattern on the high bands. Being; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00171.html (11,387 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]