Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WARC\s+\&\s+\"anti\-contests\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WARC\s+\&\s+\"anti\-contests\"\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WARC & "anti-contests" (score: 1): Author: ddjones@nas.com (Dale Jones K5MM); Date: Mon Jan 12 11:56:10 1998; John, K1RC wrote about WARC band "un-contests"....See his note at the bottom of this page: John, A few comments, since I participated in some of the earlier discussion on this issue. 1. I do accept t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00221.html (11,638 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] WARC & "anti-contests" (score: 1): Author: Ve3bmv@aol.com (Ve3bmv); Date: Tue Jan 13 17:27:31 1998; << 3. You, and folks of your persuasion, seem to want the WARC bands to remain as they always have been since we got the allocation. I would suggest there is room for GROWTH, for change, and for othe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00261.html (7,681 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] WARC & "anti-contests" (score: 1): Author: w7why@mail.coos.or.us (Tom Osborne); Date: Wed Jan 14 02:36:11 1998; Hi Yuri. Evidently you have never listened on 17 meters. If those people I hear up there are "technically minded", I must have been listening to different people than you. I hear people talking about; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-01/msg00264.html (7,145 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]