Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WAE\s+Packet\s+rules\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WAE\s+Packet\s+rules\?\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] WAE Packet rules??? (score: 1): Author: ww3s@zoominternet.net (WW3S); Date: Wed Jun 11 23:41:23 2003; What's the problem with WAE packet rules? Is it that they list all the single ops(even with packet) in one category, even though the packet users are so noted? Is that really any different than list; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00164.html (8,067 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] WAE Packet rules??? (score: 1): Author: w7why@charter.net (Tom Osborne); Date: Thu Jun 12 14:59:57 2003; Hi Jamie The biggest difference is that the SO2R guys are doing all the tuning, mult hunting, etc themselves (if not using packet). If you are using packet, you have ~1000 people doing the hunting an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00166.html (7,916 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] WAE Packet rules??? (score: 1): Author: VSH@UDM.NET (VSH); Date: Fri Jun 13 15:15:12 2003; - Hi Jamie The biggest difference is that the SO2R guys are doing all the tuning, mult hunting, etc themselves (if not using packet). If you are using packet, you have ~1000 people doing the hunting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00169.html (7,779 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] WAE Packet rules??? (score: 1): Author: wd4ahz@gte.net (Ron Wetjen); Date: Fri Jun 13 12:36:37 2003; You still have to copy the callsign! If you "guess" right ... lucky you. If you "guess" wrong, busted call ... shame on you! information for us....... Not if you make your own! Ron; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00171.html (7,591 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]