- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Valid SS QSO (score: 1)
- Author: "Roberts, Will" <Will.Roberts@pgnmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:04:25 -0500
- I worked the same guy because I needed KP4 for a multiplier. He gave me his call, a number and precedent. I stuck with it and asked him for the "year he was first licensed" and "confirm you're in Pue
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00301.html (8,632 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Valid SS QSO (score: 1)
- Author: I H <ih772@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:24:31 -0800 (PST)
- I understand your technique of extracting the info out of the casual operators cruising the band, there may be a few pieces of lumber hanging on the wall of my shack. ;-) So getting back to my origin
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00321.html (10,913 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Valid SS QSO (score: 1)
- Author: kd4d@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:02:20 +0000
- Good day: I don't see this is an issue for the contest sponsor. IMHO, if I log the QSO with the required exchange information, I'm claiming a valid QSO. The contest sponsor just needs to check the ac
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00337.html (8,352 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Valid SS QSO (score: 1)
- Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:55:56 -0500
- I bet that KP4 is not sending in a log. If he does all QSOs made are worthless. Such an instance is not uncommon in contests. How about the following which happened to me over the years: 1. The Dx st
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00345.html (8,250 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Valid SS QSO (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Adams <kfiveka@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:23:26 -0600
- Not true Dave. From time to time a log may be deemed "unstable". If you "bust" the unstable portion of the exchange you will not be penalized. Log checking gets more and more sophisticated every year
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00356.html (7,229 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu