Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Use\s+of\s+CW\s+decoders\s+in\s+contests\s+\-\s+NO\,\s+IT\s+IS\s+NOT\s+\"SIMPLE\"\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE" (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:02:08 +0000 (GMT)
Whatever TECHNOLOGY that you use INSIDE your station during the contest period should be allowed in the "unassisted" category. This specifically would allow decoders, "panoramic scopes", LOCAL skimme
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00266.html (7,815 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE" (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 18:06:29 -0800
Doug, In my opinion, internet email reflectors are mostly fact-free. And that's a fact. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" -- Proud Member of: A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00267.html (8,501 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE" (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:25:36 -0800
Doug, I've composed a half dozen public responses to your public scolding, and discarded them all after counting to ten. Since I'm not an official of any Radiosport contest, I find no requirement to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00000.html (8,870 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE" (score: 1)
Author: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 21:15:06 -0500
How is this a reflector? Where I come from they're called mail lists. No one else but hams have mis-named this function a "reflector". 73, de Nate >> -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00001.html (7,837 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE" (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:25:54 -0500
Actually I always thought reflector is a better fit. A reflector reflects back something. a list is a number or group, ( of e mail addresses) In your E-Mail program you can have a list but not a refl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00009.html (8,291 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE" (score: 1)
Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 09:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
I think the simple answer for any new or future contester is to contest the contest organizers directly with contest specific questions. I have found that all are more than happy to help and provide
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00010.html (10,840 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - NO, IT IS NOT "SIMPLE" (score: 1)
Author: Iain MacDonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 10:15:50 -0700
I'd been assuming that this terminology was a hangover from packet radio, or something, although I can't find any reference to non-email "packet reflectors". I work for a UNIX-based company, and ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00013.html (8,537 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu