Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Uniques\.\.\.actual\s+numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Uniques\.\.\.actual\s+numbers\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Uniques...actual numbers (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:37:23 +0000 (GMT); Gee whiz. I hate rumors. First, the only people with a U rate of 50% are people who make 2 QSOs and get one wrong. Most U rates are very small (the vast majority are under 0.5%). Yes, that is one hal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00066.html (8,264 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Uniques...actual numbers (score: 1): Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:09:27 -0700; RE: kr2q comments I don't place much credence in claims that anyone getting more than a fraction of a percent uniques must be copying call signs wrong. I can think of a number of situations where the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00109.html (10,934 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]