- 1. [CQ-Contest] Um, Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 05:48:09 -0700
- Thanks for all that support (I *think* it's support) on the book. The goal was to create a "Desktop Elmer" for new hams and a friendly introduction for the passerby who probably has unflattering ment
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00274.html (8,223 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Um, Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 23:55:29 -0400
- At 08:48 AM 4/13/2004, Ward Silver wrote: The goal was to create a "Desktop Elmer" for new hams and a friendly introduction for the passerby who probably has unflattering mental images of ham radio.
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00289.html (8,822 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Um, Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:35:17 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ I noticed in his list of the different kind of nets, Ward wisely omitted DX nets. :-) -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW -- The world's top contest
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00298.html (8,143 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Um, Thanks (score: 1)
- Author: "Gerry Treas, K8GT" <k8gt@twmi.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 23:09:08 -0400
- Of course not. Ward is no Dummy. ;^) 73, Gerry K8GT sorry . . . . couldn't resist. Bill Turner wrote: I noticed in his list of the different kind of nets, Ward wisely omitted DX nets. :-) -- Bill, W6
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00312.html (8,842 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu