- 1. [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on DQs in CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 07:21:46 -0400
- (just grabbed some countries and drilled down). I counted everyone participating in a multi and used their home callsign as a national. 11 - Italy (plus II9P team - typically 6 - 10 ops) 5 - US 5 -
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00232.html (7,481 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on DQs in CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 08:32:04 -0500
- This self spotting issue on SSB is much ado about nothing, in my opinion. What's the difference in having 50 friends who spot you once each and five friends who spot you 10 times each. Who really car
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00233.html (8,963 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on DQs in CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 11:25:10 -0400
- In this case the CC didn't really uncover much in the USA. There are several stations who have cheerleaders spotting them. It's a fairly common practice, even encouraged as a way to boost scores. I
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00234.html (11,220 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on DQs in CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 11:39:19 -0400
- Stan, I agree that I don't believe that in most cases the DQ'd cheating mattered much to the results. But we have been shown that in at least one case in QRP and one case in HP Unassisted, the World
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00236.html (10,938 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on DQs in CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 11:04:39 -0600
- I would agree on the self spotting. We already have self spotting on CW and RTTY in the way of skimmers and the RBN. It would not be an issue if we had a SSB equivalent. On SSB being spotted is an ad
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00239.html (16,196 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on DQs in CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:53:59 +0200
- But that is still no self spotting! 73 Peter On the self spotting, its not about quantity, its about quality. Just one friend that spots you every time you come on a new run frequency and then an hou
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00241.html (8,215 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on DQs in CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 22:45:52 +0000
- How does your friend know you came on a new run freq? There's some behaviour that follows the pattern of cheerleading and some that follows the pattern of cheating. A friend finding you on her own an
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00244.html (10,136 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on DQs in CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:36:31 -0400
- There is some ado in self spotting in SSB, though I agree that friends doing it is a bit much for a DQ, absent other issues. Perhaps we need to limit spotting to X spots per hour per station? Whether
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00245.html (9,519 bytes)
- 9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on DQs in CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 03:40:59 +0200
- When he monitored the previous run frequency and it sounds abandoned he might look for the new one. That is pretty easy with a S9+60 signal when he is on groundwave distance. 73 Peter How does your f
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00246.html (8,713 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu