Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+The\s+impending\s+demise\s+of\s+SSB\s+spotting\s+in\s+contests\s+\-\s+and\s+should\s+we\s+care\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] The impending demise of SSB spotting in contests - and should we care? (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:33:59 -0500
Did you know that over 40,000 different stations made at least one contact with the 8500 stations who submitted logs for  the CQWW SSB contest in 2018?   Without the non-entrant, casual ops, SSB cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00192.html (8,757 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] The impending demise of SSB spotting in contests - and should we care? (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 12:31:22 -0700
This raises an interesting question: If there is no SSB RBN, and everyone is just clicking on spots, where do the new spots come from? The ONE operator who isnt clicking on spots? Might unassisted op
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00197.html (10,354 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] The impending demise of SSB spotting in contests - and should we care? (score: 1)
Author: Frank Grossmann <dl2cc@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 20:13:45 +0000
Contest sponsors should require all software authors to have the "Spot all S&P QSOs" available AND switched on by default... No harm in doing that. Assuming somebody taking part in unassisted doesn't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00199.html (10,710 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] The impending demise of SSB spotting in contests - and should we care? (score: 1)
Author: K4Sbz Stan <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:14:33 -0500
I am one of the casual contesters. I am an avid participater, but not a challenger for top score. In many contests, I operate non-assisted. Although I frequently run, the panadapter on my SDR radio m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00200.html (10,741 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] The impending demise of SSB spotting in contests - and should we care? (score: 1)
Author: Chris Plumblee <chris.plumblee@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 21:07:49 -0500
The danger with "spot all s&p QSOs" is that many casual and not-so-casual operators who don't use sound card DVK don't switch between Run and S&P properly. Any number of times I've found a frequency,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00205.html (12,593 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] The impending demise of SSB spotting in contests - and should we care? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 21:02:35 -0700
The danger with "spot all s&p QSOs" is that many casual and not-so-casual operators who don't use sound card DVK don't switch between Run and S&P properly. Any number of times I've found a frequency,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00210.html (9,200 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu