While I believe that technically, internet based remote contesting might be achievable (seems like delays are an inhibiter right now), I am predicting that the practice would regulated out by the Con
Tono, let me give you some historical HF contesting perspective first. My first PC online contesting operation was in 1984 CQ WW SSB. In two weeks time I'll celebrate 15 years of my PC DSP CW robot m
Mario, if I offered a $100 reward (which I don't recall), it would have to have been tongue-in-cheek. In my view, amateur radio contesting needs or will soon need a new rule - only the human mind may
In my view, amateur radio contesting needs or will soon need a new rule - only the human mind may be used for real-time extraction of intelligence from received signals. ** Be wary of getting what yo
I'd like to know if there is anyone out there who has actually learned the code that way. The dark future I see is one where robots with enough computing power will, as Mario says, do SO6R without th
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-05/msg00108.html As far as I remember, this escalated in your offer of 100$ award to first robot win in major contest. Human mind is always
No more teletype contests? 73, Hank, W6SX Mammoth Lakes, California _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
In my view, amateur radio contesting needs or will soon need a new rule - only the human mind may be used for real-time extraction of intelligence from received signals. I think that would knock out
Pete - A CW decoder on the screen of a logging program already exists. Writelog has it and it's a very good one. I'm a perfect example of what K8MR wrote about - I "knew" the code when I really got i
Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:19:40 -0500
Dont worry, we have so much fun on RTTY it will still be there... 73 de Claude VE2FK No more teletype contests? 73, Hank, W6SX Mammoth Lakes, California ______________________________________________
I still have to read what's being printed on the screen for a RTTY contest. I don't just let the computer pick out the callsign and automatically do the reply. There may be software that does this, b
RTTY is different, of course. But I'm sure you knew that. 73, Pete N4ZR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
Ed: "SO2R in a box" was a reality 15 years ago when Yaesu introduced the FT-1000D. The FT-1000D had Dual "Out of Band Receive" which allowed listen on, say both 80M and 20M at the SAME time. The FT-1
Having two receivers on different bands is SO2R only if the second band receiver works on a separate antenna and listens while transmitting on the first band. 73, Keith NM5G Ed: "SO2R in a box" was a
NM5G: Having two receivers on different bands is SO2R only if the second band receiver works on a separate antenna and listens while transmitting on the first band. WRTC-2006 saw YT1NT introducing fo