Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+The\s+OO\s+Strikes\s+Back\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW)
Date: Fri Mar 8 13:19:36 2002
In amongst today's mail was my first "QSL" from the ARRL DX Phone -- an OO notice complaining about my contact with one of the Italian 2x1's -- an Out of Band violation, to be specific. Now, interest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00095.html (8,233 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: loumecseri@bestnetpc.com (Lou Mecseri)
Date: Fri Mar 8 20:54:23 2002
Are OOs responsible to monitor SSB intruders in the 10, 12, 21 m CW bands? What do they do with the collected information. What does FCC doing about the problem? 73s Lou KE1F OO Out all my our
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00097.html (9,054 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: jmax@attglobal.net (jmax@attglobal.net)
Date: Fri Mar 8 18:08:55 2002
Ron - Of course, what *may* have happened is that the OO heard so many problematic QSOs above 14.347 that he/she prepared the forms to cut down on the time required to fill them out. Even OOs like to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00098.html (9,162 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos)
Date: Sat Mar 9 02:46:30 2002
I o I once got an OO notice congratulating me! Working split on 40, I blasted a local QSO (no, I didn't listen first!! No excuse, but it probably wouldn't have helped as I couldn't hear most of them
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00100.html (10,490 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: N5RP@pdq.net (Bob, N5RP)
Date: Sat Mar 9 07:53:45 2002
==> They send it to Microsoft. Bob Perring ........................................... Amateur Radio Station N5RP mailto:N5RP@pdq.net N5RP Station Page: http://freeweb.pdq.net/perring/station.html
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00117.html (8,003 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: maposte@hotmail.com (Fred NA2U)
Date: Sat Mar 9 16:51:07 2002
A similar situation on 15m. I was involved in one where the DX was actually listening up out of the band! I wasn't paying close enough attention but geez I had a lot of company up there. In any case,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00128.html (9,568 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: k8do@amethyst.diamondcs.net (Dennis O'Connor)
Date: Sat Mar 9 12:53:53 2002
Try listening just above the band edge during a contest and you will quickly realize why the OO has to have the form preprinted except for the call, etc., in order to even hope of keeping up with the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00129.html (9,356 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: loumecseri@bestnetpc.com (Lou Mecseri)
Date: Sat Mar 9 17:11:43 2002
Steve, you are right. OOs send out "OFFICIAL OBSERVER ADVISORY NOTICE". W2CC, must been sitting on S51CK's frequency and copied calls of stations worked him in the contest. According to David, (S51CK
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00134.html (12,748 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Sat Mar 9 13:14:18 2002
There was a S51 station on two afternoons running on a very clear frequency at about 14348.5. I was tempted to call him since I had worked everyone else I could hear calling CQ and I couldn't hear we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00139.html (8,034 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne)
Date: Sat Mar 9 23:04:30 2002
Or some telemarketer selling frequency counters. Tom W7WHY
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00140.html (7,937 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: frenaye@pcnet.com (Tom Frenaye)
Date: Sat Mar 9 19:16:46 2002
No one seems to have answered Bob's question... Official Observers are not focused on reporting intruders within ham bands. For more info: http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/org/oo.html The ARRL Monit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00142.html (8,431 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: N5RP@pdq.net (Bob, N5RP)
Date: Sat Mar 9 18:42:32 2002
==> YO ! There was probably no answer to Bob because Bob did not ask the question. I know. I was there when I did not ask the question. This message was sent from Bob's PDA Bob is absent. Bob Perring
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00145.html (8,188 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: otterstad@enter.vg (Ragnar Otterstad)
Date: Sun Mar 10 15:55:14 2002
That does bring up one DX station I ran into on 40m - wish I could remember the call - "150, 150, DX1DX Contest listening 150". To the credit of us USA types, in the 2 minutes or so I spent listening
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00161.html (8,062 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: andrew@gi0nwg.freeserve.co.uk (andrew)
Date: Sun Mar 10 18:26:36 2002
The difference is that it is illegal for US stations to operate LSB on 7.150. It is NOT illegal for most European stations to operate LSB below 7.040. It might be against the *gentlemans agreed* band
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00169.html (7,769 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] The OO Strikes Back (score: 1)
Author: otterstad@enter.vg (Ragnar Otterstad)
Date: Mon Mar 11 07:55:46 2002
The difference is that it is illegal for US stations to operate LSB on 7.150. It is NOT illegal for most European stations to operate LSB below 7.040. It might be against the *gentlemans agreed* ban
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00183.html (7,091 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu