- 1. [CQ-Contest] The K3 and key clicks (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:05:58 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- This is the second discussion of key clicks on the cq-contest reflector and again Elecraft is being supported as the only transceiver clean enough to be entered in contests. I find it hard to believe
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00250.html (7,712 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] The K3 and key clicks (score: 1)
- Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 07:42:20 +0300
- Dave, not correct... Elecraft might be best in class, but there are many others that fulfill criteria for being a clean rig. Just to mention one, the TS 590 S (and most likely the newer model SG) are
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00260.html (9,167 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] The K3 and key clicks (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:33:07 -0800
- Just to mention one, the TS 590 S (and most likely the newer model SG) are excellent CW-rigs without any tendency of clicking. Apparently you did not bother to read TXNoise.pdf In it, I observed that
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00275.html (8,649 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] The K3 and key clicks (score: 1)
- Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:44:26 +0500
- Hi Mats, TS 590 is indeed a nice contest radio. But unfortunately operator can change (intentionally or unintentionally) setting in the menu to make it clicking on CW. That cannot happen with K3. CW
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00280.html (11,122 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu