Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sweepstakes\:\s+Should\s+I\s+be\s+penalized\s+forgetting\s+mylicense\s+in\s+2000\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense in 2000? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>
Date: 08 Nov 2006 01:40:05 -0600
Speaking of changing your check... did anyone notice a lot of entrants who *weren't* K0HB were sending different checks than they did last year? Or did my copying accuracy really stink in 2005? -- Do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00265.html (9,205 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense in 2000? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:03:55 -0500
I've also heard from the ARRL Contest Branch that the check per se isn't significant as long as it's consistent. In other words, they're not going to, er, check your check. The purpose of the check a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00323.html (9,878 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense in 2000? (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Hedges" <bhedges@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:04:52 -0500
Well, 00-06 are, really, earlier than 12... just a century later! 73, Brad AL4T/4 Ck 03 <snip> And the earliest possible check would be "12" since 1912 was the first year that the US Department of Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00369.html (7,881 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense in 2000? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:50:59 -0500
Although numerically 00 - 06 are smaller numbers than 12, they represent the years 2000 - 2006; 12 represents 1912 (at least for another 6 years when we finally overlap the centuries). So 12 is still
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00380.html (8,803 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense in 2000? (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 22:36:37 -0600 (CST)
Are there any of them left? Who was the earliest licensed individual ham (not counting clubs) in SS this year? 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00384.html (8,213 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense in 2000? (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Merrill" <barry@mxg.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 05:44:22 -0600
Slightly off topic, but here in Ireland, I've just recently heard references to "the seventies, eighties, nineties, and the NAUGHTIES" for this decade. 73 Barry EI/W5GN ______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00430.html (8,181 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu