Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sweepstakes\:\s+Should\s+I\s+be\s+penalized\s+for\s+gettingmylicense\s+in\s+2000\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sweepstakes\:\s+Should\s+I\s+be\s+penalized\s+for\s+gettingmylicense\s+in\s+2000\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized for gettingmylicense in 2000? (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:26:19 -0600; The extent to which you're being robbed depends to a great extent on how full your weekend was. It seems to me that in SSCW , any rate less than about 72 an hour means you have lots of time to send y; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00252.html (11,371 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized for gettingmylicense in 2000? (score: 1): Author: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>; Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:26:23 -0600; Denis. The length of 00 shouldn't be a show-stopper, unless of course, you have finished just outside the 7 to 14 qso's behind the category winner. It's probably less of a concern than other things.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00271.html (10,389 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized for gettingmylicense in 2000? (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:06:18 +0000; Ron Notarius W3WN wrote: snipped The reality is that the log checkers at ARRL may not have a way of knowing what year you were first licensed, and since they don't consider that significant, they ins; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00354.html (9,694 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]