Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Survey\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Survey\s+results\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Survey results (score: 1): Author: W0uo@cs.com (W0uo@cs.com); Date: Fri Jan 11 00:32:09 2002; The accuracy of a survey depends on four things. First, the size of the sample (not the proportion of the population sampled). Second, the randomness of the sample. Third, the response rate (to be su; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00184.html (6,748 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Survey results (score: 1): Author: "Bill Conwell" <bill@conwellpdx.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 09:04:29 -0700; 138 folks responded to the survey about in-band dual CQing posted to SurveyMonkey on Thursday. (98 responded in the first 20 hours) 77 of the respondents identified themselves. 86% reported NOT previ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00478.html (19,914 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Survey results (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 15:17:59 -0600; I read that no contest meant that the practice should no be allowed in any contest. I wonder how many thought the same? W0MU 77 of the respondents identified themselves. 86% reported NOT previously p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00482.html (24,153 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Survey results (score: 1): Author: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 16:12:41 +0000; +1 73, Maarten PD2R _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00502.html (28,688 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]