Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Stubs\s+\-\s+they\s+are\s+not\s+mysterious\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Stubs\s+\-\s+they\s+are\s+not\s+mysterious\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Stubs - they are not mysterious (score: 1): Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:28:25 +0200; Eric K3NA has a good recipe. https://www.yccc.org/Articles/K3NA_stubs.pdf I have built mine very much like this. I used wave/4 instead of 2x wave/8 stubs. K3NA dual stub design is not placement sensi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00284.html (7,463 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stubs - they are not mysterious (score: 1): Author: Jim George <n3bb@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:45:05 -0600; Also, for the perfectionist, you can buy professional caliber stubs from W2VJN (Top Ten Devices). He did my stubs for my SO2R setup. Jim N3BB I have built mine very much like this. I used wave/4 inst; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00285.html (8,442 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stubs - they are not mysterious (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 11:48:06 -0800; WRONG! ANY stub design intended to suppress harmonics IS sensitive to placement if the antenna with which it is used is NOT resonant at the harmonic. The use of double stubs insures that at least one; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00287.html (10,678 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]