Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Stimulating\s+Participation\s+was\:\s+LimitedAntenna\s+HeightCategory\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Stimulating\s+Participation\s+was\:\s+LimitedAntenna\s+HeightCategory\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: LimitedAntenna HeightCategory (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:03:10 -00; participation, "As measured by log submissions" isn't really material -- getting more signals on the air should be the focus. "More logs" is an incidental by-product. I don't think any statistically; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00878.html (8,834 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stimulating Participation was: LimitedAntenna HeightCategory (score: 1): Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:52:47 -0600; I have seen stats suggesting that perhaps as few as one in 8 or 10 stations logged in CQWW even bothers to send in a log. Pete, thanks for your comment and suggestion. Your point about LOTW is well t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00891.html (13,487 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]