- 1. [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry no packet (score: 1)
- Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:41:07 -0700
- I jumped into the Stew Perry last night. SO low power. I did fine 241 contacts and whatever points. I have to say that what I missed about not having packet is a sense of the contest going on around
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00267.html (9,480 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry no packet (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:46:41 -0400
- ".Unfortunately, this contest also dumps SO packet into a class with multiops. Their contest their rul ." VE9AA replies: Mike - thanks for the Q last night. Not sure how you found me w/o packet. (hi
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00273.html (8,986 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry no packet (score: 1)
- Author: Shelby Summerville <k4ww@twc.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:42:57 -0500
- W0MU wrote: "I am glad that someone found me and wanted to work me." My sentiments, exactly. In 160 meter contests, I rely on the receiving ability of other stations, as I don't have the room for eff
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00282.html (9,119 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry no packet (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:43:15 -0500
- So, no problem Mike. If you want to monitor a packet cluster while operating in the contest, go for it! That's what I did last night. Of course, this does mean that you have to submit a check log, no
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-12/msg00284.html (11,102 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu