Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Station\s+Re\-Build\s+\-\s+Coax\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:51:59 -0500
My multi-two station, with third spotting station, is being rebuilt into new digs. I have a lot of 3-4 foot RG213 cables running between the amp, power meter, tuner and switch. I have heard there may
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00058.html (7,385 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Duffy" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:16:50 -0400
Hello Keith: Only using RG-400 double shield high isolation cables at K3LR https://www.dxengineering.com/parts/dxe-rg400r003 Handles 1500 watts in the HF bands no problem. 73 Tim K3LR --Original Mess
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00062.html (8,314 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: charlie carroll <k1xx@k1xx.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:23:06 -0400
Keith: A couple very similar candidate cables are RG-400 and RG-303. RG-400 is double shielded while 303 is single.  They're good as interconnects because they have a small bend radius (about 1"). RG
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00063.html (7,861 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 03:35:57 +0000
I third the sugjestion of the RG400 small enough for all the switching in a more then one radio setup. The tight bend radius the small diameter make for a clean instlation that coupled with the doubl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00065.html (9,725 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 20:48:23 -0700
The quality of a cable shield can have a strong effect on crosstalk, very important in a multi-transmitter environment. This characteristic of a cable shield is quantified as its Transfer Impedance -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00066.html (8,905 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:41:40 -0500
Thanks for the info. Looks like RG400 is an excellent choice. 73, Keith NM5G The quality of a cable shield can have a strong effect on crosstalk, very important in a multi-transmitter environment. Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00068.html (9,302 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:51:25 -0400
I just bought 10 feet of RG-400U (supposedly Harbour Industries) through E-bay for $13.  Belatedly, I learned it was coming from China.  It's now here, but I don't think it is for real - it only has
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00069.html (10,989 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:55:47 +0000
Sorry to hear that. A CHINA rip off and with no printed RG 400 on the inner coral jacket a RIP for sure thanks for the heads up Wayne W3EA Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=55098
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00070.html (12,224 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 12:04:46 -0400
Can you file a complaint with eBay and get your $$ back? Sounds like the "RG400" is actually not-as-advertised. 73, ron w3wn I just bought 10 feet of RG-400U (supposedly Harbour Industries) through E
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00073.html (13,081 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:30:36 +0000
George RG 400 is a double braded silver shield Teflon insulation multi silver center conductor and 0.195 DIA LMR400 is a solid center conductor foam dialectric tined copper brade and thermal foil shi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00077.html (14,611 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 16:51:35 -0500
Pete It would be helpful to know who the vendor is that you bought the bad cable from; so we don't make the same mistake. A link would do the trick.73,Gary K9GS -- Original message --From: N4ZR <n4zr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00079.html (12,080 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:25:22 -0400
This is an interesting post since I just made a RG400 jumper last night. It was made with coax also purchased on eBay more than a year ago however mine is clearly marked with the manufacture's name -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00089.html (9,140 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:48:38 -0400
Oops.  I did some more dissecting on the cable, and I'm wrong about the shielding. That leaves only the absence of printing - this is advertised as Harbour Industries RG-400 - and its stiffness.  Thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00090.html (12,992 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 13:24:49 +0000
Pete, I am holding in my hand two manufacturs M17/128 RG-400 MR -C-17G 12814 Thermax RGS 400 and ALPHA MIL-C-17/1288 M17/128-RG 400 There Not supple stiff , not flexable like RG8X . The cable is STIF
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00092.html (15,313 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: "tony.kaz--- via CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:27:43 -0400
Pete, Checked some RG142 vs RG400. With a hand squeeze test it is easier to flex the RG400. Not scientific but you can feel the difference. My RG400 is marked "M17/128 RG400 MIL DTL 17 27478 HARBOUR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00093.html (16,153 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: "tony.kaz--- via CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:45:12 -0400
Did some more checking on eBay for RG179. Besides selling some unmarked cable as "Harbor", there are listings that show Harbour Industries horizontal vs vertical printing on the coax. All my Harbour
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00094.html (16,797 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: Mike/W5JR <w5jr.lists@att.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:47:47 -0400
The cable youre describing sounds more like RG-142 than RG-400. They look similar. RG-142 has a solid beryllium copper center conductor that is prone to fracture if flexed repeatedly. tnx Mike / W5JR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00095.html (15,295 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: Alan Higbie <alan.higbie@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 08:59:07 -0600
Relevant to this discussion is an extensive study conducted by US Navy: THE MITIGATION OF RADIO NOISE AND INTERFERENCE FROM ON-SITE SOURCES at RADIO RECEIVING SITES (November 2009) by Wilbur R. Vince
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00096.html (9,653 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 11:04:37 -0700
Both for re-wiring my station and for my project on the new Choke Cookbook, I've purchased roughly 200 ft of RG400, all printed with the label of Harbour Industries. It is relatively stiff, as are ot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00097.html (12,270 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax (score: 1)
Author: donovanf@starpower.net
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:28:45 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Pete, I can easily wrap my Times Microwave RG-400 around my finger. But the improved shielding effectiveness of double shielded coaxial cables such as RG-400 and RG-214 doesn't provide a useful pe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-03/msg00098.html (15,528 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu