Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sprint\s+Mults\s+down\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sprint\s+Mults\s+down\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Sprint Mults down (score: 1): Author: K5NZ@aol.com (K5NZ@aol.com); Date: Mon Sep 16 09:50:49 2002; As I keep reading all the comments in the Sprint scores on 3830, I notice a common thread about lack of mults, where were all the mults, low activity. Funny that after K9PG gets slammed for e-mailing; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00144.html (7,040 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Sprint Mults down (score: 1): Author: rrossi@btv.ibm.com (Ron D. Rossi); Date: Mon Sep 16 11:54:35 2002; I have no problem with what PG was doing to boost activity! I noted that 40m was not nearly as productive at the start as it had been in previous years. Starting on 40m was a 'trademark' of his get o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00146.html (8,253 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Sprint Mults down (score: 1): Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Mon Sep 16 16:32:18 2002; Activity was not down on SSB but on CW as well. Plus the activity has always been better on CW anyway. I suspect alot of those guys Paul recruited were "newbees" and after doing a Sprint for the firs; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00155.html (9,801 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Sprint Mults down (score: 1): Author: bob.wruble@verizon.net (Bob Wruble); Date: Mon Sep 16 08:42:02 2002; mults/activity especially ve were dwn at this qth de w7gg missed ia, ne, ms, id, sc, wy + ve 2, 5, 8 got ve4 but he was a non contester ...... some contesters i know do not like this event/format ...; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-09/msg00158.html (8,244 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]