Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmer\s+vs\.\s+assisted\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Skimmer\s+vs\.\s+assisted\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:50:19 -0500; Hi all, I agree that with some contests, there is a grey area regarding whether Skimmer constitutes assistance. However, there is no grey area, no splitting of hairs when it comes to CQ WW and WPX. B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00524.html (7,997 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted (score: 1): Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:11:42 -0400; Kelly, Thank you for sending!. I had an e-mail I was in the process of completing when something went astray with my computer browser and I lost it. I had the rule copied and pasted and was making th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00528.html (11,597 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted (score: 1): Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:46:35 -0500; Question: What does Cluster do? It shows you who's where, with callsigns, assuming the poster copied correctly. Does CW Skimmer show you who is on the band, with callsigns? Yes. That it's a robot in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00532.html (12,201 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Frugoli" <alfred.frugoli@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:12:32 -0400; Only if ARRL wants to exclude Skimmer from it's contests. Who's to say the rules aren't intentionally vague - mabye to encourage innovation? 73 de Al, KE1FO __________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00534.html (8,139 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted (score: 1): Author: Aldewey@aol.com; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:26:18 EDT; I would suggest the ARRL CAC has some work to do, as it could be argued that the rules of ARRL contests do not restrict Skimmer use. Kelley; Just to be clear, it is not the ARRL CAC that makes this d; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00535.html (8,316 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted (score: 1): Author: ALANNOTTAGE@aol.com; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:20:21 EDT; Maybe that's the key Kelly. It is YOUR equipment within the 500m circle that FINDS the stations for you. You are not receiving DX ALERTS from any source and YOU and nobody else are the sole OPERATOR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00536.html (7,926 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted (score: 1): Author: "Alfred Frugoli" <ke1fo@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:18:15 -0400; Only if ARRL wants to exclude Skimmer from it's contests. Who's to say the rules aren't intentionally vague - mabye to encourage innovation? 73 de Al, KE1FO __________________________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00538.html (7,911 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:27:35 -0400; There would be no question that CW Skimmer is not assistance if the cluster system were not so widely abused. CW Skimmer is simply the next step in the evolution of contest hardware that started wit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00539.html (14,569 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]