Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Simple\s+solution\s+to\s+address\s+CQ\s+WW\s+CW\s+problems\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:49:57 -0800 (PST)
Require anyone with a potential top 5 category placement to submit a recording of all 48 hours of the contest effort along with their log. Clicking packet spots unassisted? Easy to spot. More than on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00292.html (7,509 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:14:46 -0000
This qualifies as the runner-up entry for "LVIPCQCRTY" Award. (Least Viable Idea Posted on CQ-Contest Reflector This Year") The winner of the "LVIPCQCRTY" Award is "Let's make everyones log public".
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00303.html (8,549 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:29:51 -0800 (PST)
Really? It was such a bad, non-viable idea that the WRTC-2006 in Brazil implemented it as a rule requirement. If you're serious about trying to win, set up a recording device on your computer and rec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00306.html (9,643 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: Andy Blank <n2nt@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:42:49 -0500
Great idea Scott! Sometimes the simplest solution is the best. This is one of the best ideas I've heard, and would love to see it. Of course, it would be fought every step of the way. There are lots
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00307.html (9,844 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:43:56 -0000
WRTC is a small handful of stations in a strictly controlled ("level playing field") environment. Those conditions and restrictions aren't remotely representative of "contesting in the wild". 73, de
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00311.html (9,051 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:52:51 EST
This qualifies as the runner-up entry for "LVIPCQCRTY" Award. (Least Viable Idea Posted on CQ-Contest Reflector This Year") The winner of the "LVIPCQCRTY" Award is "Let's make everyones log public".
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00312.html (9,088 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:49:49 +0000
Mid June sometimes I turn on 6m and find a contest going on, so I pass out a few points. Then it starts to rain and I stay on and play some on 2m and 70cm. I send a log in and get a certificate. I di
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00313.html (12,450 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:46:29 -0500
So what? WRTC is a limited event with a limited number of competing stations. To require everyone who HOPES he might have a chance to win to record all 48 hours or to DENY anyone who might be lucky
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00327.html (9,770 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:14:26 -0700
So now I have to record an entire contest somehow and if by chance my hard drive crashes on the way back to the USA my score does not count.... Why not require all logs to be submitted electronically
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00331.html (11,948 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:34:31 +0500
This is 21st century.... What tape you are talking about. Get yourself cheap MP3 player with line input and 1-2Gig of memory and you can easily record 48 hours 2 radio and get file transferred to you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00332.html (9,976 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:05:51 -0500
Sorry Scott. No. Absolutely not. I have limited enough resources to devote to my station (and quite a few antenna updates & redesigns to implement at the new QTH). Forcing me to spend any of my limit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00343.html (10,729 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:48:59 -0600 (CST)
You're talking a whole different ball of wax there. I usually participate as a QRP-portable in the VHF contests. There is no such thing as a QRP-portable entry in most HF contests. I manage to cram e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00346.html (10,577 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:29:35 +0100
W4PA: There are already a number of high scoring ops that are habitually recording themselves operating contests already. Unforunately there are number of high scoring ops who do not even claim score
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00389.html (8,733 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu