Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Serial\s+numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Serial\s+numbers\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: n3oc@wirelessinc.com (Brian McGinness); Date: Sun Aug 22 04:47:41 1999; Hey guys and gals, please remember that adding a serial number to the exchange will pose many difficulties for the multi-multi stations! CT for example, does not do well in a multi/multi environment; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00167.html (7,869 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@berkshire.net (David Robbins); Date: Sun Aug 22 13:06:27 1999; ct does great in m/m where serial numbers are unique to the band. where it has trouble is when you do m/s or s/2 with networked computers and you have to have one set of serial numbers across all the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00168.html (7,841 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: n3oc@wirelessinc.com (Brian McGinness); Date: Sun Aug 22 04:47:41 1999; Hey guys and gals, please remember that adding a serial number to the exchange will pose many difficulties for the multi-multi stations! CT for example, does not do well in a multi/multi environment; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00428.html (7,858 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@berkshire.net (David Robbins); Date: Sun Aug 22 13:06:27 1999; ct does great in m/m where serial numbers are unique to the band. where it has trouble is when you do m/s or s/2 with networked computers and you have to have one set of serial numbers across all the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00429.html (7,855 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:36:08 -0800; If only that were true. What if you start a QSO and hand out a number, but then you don't complete the QSO - and in the meantime another station makes a QSO with the next number. Okay - what if 3 st; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00508.html (7,624 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:45:38 -0500; Busted QSO's, eh? You don't hit enter or that final tab until you have that QSO finished do you? 8^) Of course there are scenarios that can be a problem. We can come up with a lot of them just by usi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00531.html (9,060 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: N7DF <n7df@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:41:42 -0700 (PDT); I have noticed that there is no requirement in the WPX rules for serial numbers to be sequential, only that they begin with 001 Reminds me of the school kids chant "one two skip a few, forty four,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00195.html (7,022 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:57:56 -0400; This is what the rules say: Exchange: RS(T) report plus a progressive contact serial number starting with 001 for the first contact A progressive serial number. Is that the same as a sequential numbe; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00205.html (7,819 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Mike N0HI <mike@n0hi.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:55:31 -0400; I am disappointed the rule read "progressive." "Sequential" would have been a lot more fun... Fibonacci sequence would be a sequential number (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8). In fact, the 20th Q made would be # 6; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00206.html (9,340 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Paul Jones <paul@nn4f.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:38:41 -0400; From the WPX FAQ *Can I use different serial numbers on each band?* Single operators and multi-single stations must begin with serial number 001 and *continue in sequence* for all QSOs regardless of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00207.html (9,180 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:49:52 -0400; Progressive. Sequential. Incremental. Consecutive. I should think the intention, obviously, is that you start with 1 for the first QSO, 2 for the second, 3 for the 3rd, and so on. Such a simple conce; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00208.html (9,453 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Prasad <vu2ptt@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:31:00 +0530; 2, 44, 144, 1044, this sequence does look like progress is being made. Time to call out the lawyers :) 73 de Prasad VU2PTT, W2PTT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing li; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00209.html (9,343 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:38:19 -0400; Thank you, but when I invite K3AIR over, I'd like him to help operate the radio, not bill me to explain the nuances of the rules to me. Maybe it's just me being old and cranky, but I have to wonder..; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00211.html (10,816 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:21:58 -0600; Because other sequences than n+1 would be a lot more fun. How about factorials? 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00212.html (10,936 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: k4zw@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:42:48 +0000 (UTC); "Nothing against foxing out the competition by skipping ahead occasionally to give numbers larger than them." How about this novel concept? Just work more Q's than your competitor. That way you'll; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00215.html (7,882 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:45:00 -0400; I hope no one complains when the contest committee either changes or "clarifies" the rules due to abuse. And yes, this can probably be considered as abuse. But why bother anyway? Having high serial n; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00216.html (12,209 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:24:01 -0600; Why limit it to base 10? Hexadecimal would be fun and would throw the cut numbers users for a loop. "5NN 4DC" 49, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00230.html (13,036 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:47:45 -0500; Yeah, hex would definitely make it fun. Or how about making it real simple by using Base 2? 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN Why limit it to base 10? Hexadecimal would be fun and would throw the cut numbers us; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00236.html (14,318 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Mike <nf4l@nf4l.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:13:55 -0400; Thus limiting the contest to 10 types of hams. Those who understand binary, and those who don't. 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00238.html (15,283 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:38:43 -0600; And the cut numbers would be simple! TATTATTA - Jim AD1C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00239.html (9,168 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]