Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sending\s+Both\s+Calls\s+in\s+SS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Sending\s+Both\s+Calls\s+in\s+SS\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Sending Both Calls in SS (score: 1): Author: K4OJ@aol.com (K4OJ@aol.com); Date: Sun Nov 9 21:40:27 1997; << However, it's mostly not needed and slows you down. Is there any ambiguity in the following? 1: CQ SS de N0AX "I am available" 2: W1AW (and maybe others) "I wish to be selected" 3: W1AW 123 Q N0AX; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00221.html (7,359 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Sending Both Calls in SS (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon Nov 10 12:36:00 1997; Strikes me that the surest test of this is the number of dupes in the log and the number of stations that think they worked you when they did not. In 1062 QSOs, about 75 percent running, I had one du; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00243.html (7,917 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Sending Both Calls in SS (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon Nov 10 12:36:00 1997; Strikes me that the surest test of this is the number of dupes in the log and the number of stations that think they worked you when they did not. In 1062 QSOs, about 75 percent running, I had one du; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00571.html (7,924 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Sending Both Calls in SS (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon Nov 10 12:36:00 1997; Strikes me that the surest test of this is the number of dupes in the log and the number of stations that think they worked you when they did not. In 1062 QSOs, about 75 percent running, I had one du; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00600.html (7,919 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]